The unthought-of dangerous precedent vis-a-vis Zuma

Posted: May 8, 2009 at 11:00 am

Jacob Zuma’s first speech to the parliament on his election as State President, has the blogeratti bubbling along, full of hope that Zuma will walk the walk, as he has talked the talk quite well since the mandate was handed to the ANC, and thus him in the April elections.

Let me be honest, I believe that Jacob Zuma was corrupted by receiving money from Schabir Shaik. I think it takes mental gymnastics of the first order to presume that someone who is involved and rewarded by government contracts, who then picks up the tab for the deputy president’s entire life for over a decade, as Shaik did with Zuma, doesn’t result in the corruption of the government official.

That said, Jacob Zuma is known as a mediator and an open, if not honest, man. Should Zuma be a success over the next five years, and our country manages to do better than it has thus far under his stewardship of the government and the ANC, a VERY dangerous precedent will have been set, far worse than simply a corrupt African leader.

It will essentially signal to all politicians and power grabbers (Malema?), of all political hues, that corruption on the way to the top is acceptable as long as once you are there you aren’t corrupt and/or you improve things. This will make it harder for the electorate to decide on which people they would like to support in government, because quasi-corrupt politicians will always be able to hold up Zuma as a test case, that even those under suspicion, etc. are capable of leading well.

And that would be an interesting and very dangerous precedent, since it would insinuate that the highest office in the land has almost a baptismal quality on its occupiers – that is simply not true, but a successful Zuma presidency may make such a line of argumentation another tool in the ANC electoral toolbox.

Sphere: Related Content

Liberation Debt and the South African Electorate

Posted: May 2, 2009 at 11:26 pm

South Africa is a country recently liberated from the yoke of Apartheid, but as the years drift away, and the end of the Zuma presidency, assuming the ANC kick him out before hand, will see a half way point between the time (48 years) of National Party rule, and ANC rule, South Africans are slowly being forced to discover that liberty, like a marriage, is not simply an event of a single day, a vote falling into a ballot box, but rather a daily choice and commitment to an ideal. You have to work and strive for liberty - it isn’t simply delivered for free. 

 

We might like to look at other countries, such as the U.S. and pretend that liberty doesn’t have too high a cost in comparison to prosperity. But countries such as the U.S. fought for liberty when there was seemingly little to fight for beyond hearth and home. It surprises me when liberals decry the civil strife in Iraq, and say that the men and boys who fight there, fight for sectarian ideals, sunni vs. shia, and that Iraq will simply disintegrate because that country has only been in existence since the 1930s. Let us not forget the United States, not even a hundred years old also descended into civil and sectarian strife, without the help of a foreign power crushing the uneasy unity of disparate states and peoples. 

 

Liberty comes at a cost. You have to fight for liberty. We hope, that in a time of reason and global transparency that fight can be a clash of ideas and beliefs rather than on skin and steel. Any financier will tell you that a cost must be financed, and often, since liberty is first bought with blood, the first set of terms must be bourne out of debt. We live in an increasingly indebted world, and therefore the paradigm should be increasingly understood by the common man - we South Africans, like all who now enjoy liberty, had our liberty bought by others, and now we must pay them back with interest. 

 

Who bought our freedom? The exiles and the party apparatchiks, such as Jacob Zuma and Julius Malema would tell us that the ANC bought us liberty, and therefore we owe the organisation a debt. That debt must be paid at the ballot box, because they and only they, the ANC can be trusted with the National Democratic Revolution - the convenient academic construct of one Thabo Mbeki, former president of the ANC and the country. 

 

This may well have been so, perhaps the ANC has deserved its mandate over the last 15 years, and may well deserve so for several more terms, simply because the organisation, along with others (but never mind them), paid the price over the decades to secure freedom for all South Africans. The cruel irony of course is those who actually paid with there lives go uncelebrated, there families return to the earth to scratch a living from the barren former homelands, while those who sipped whiskey, murdered potential rivals, and plotted in African capitals reap the rewards of holding the public purse. 

 

Firstly let me say that not all members of the ANC are of this class, indeed it is in all likelihood the minority. But like any criminal cabal, they the few destroy the hard work of the many. And just as the criminal minority in our country today make our society often intolerable the many, so too do the shameful collective in ascendancy make the hard work and fidelity of loyal ANC members naught in their land grab for the wealth of the people. 

 

Of course a core aspect of debt is being forgotten by those who now clip the coupons of the liberation bond : debts eventually are paid, and capital is freed up by the debtor to be allocated elsewhere. The sooner the South African electorate pays the debt of liberation, the sooner those who collect on this purchase will be sidelined and a new generation of leaders and policy makers, either within the ANC or outside of it, will have to make new promises to the people and fight to receive the vote of the people. 

 

The peace and order, and large turnout, of the 2009 election speaks to the ordinary South African’s desire to have their voice heard - either in support of the ruling party, or against it. This is a good thing, with each election the politics of identity and liberation debt are slowly eroded, and the concerns of the new nation will slowly edge out the politics of the past - this is a slow and natural process - and while it happens we must remain ever vigilant that those who facilitated past liberation will not be transmogrified into those who wield the chains from which we as a common South African people must break from next. 

Sphere: Related Content

The worthless South African web

Posted: April 1, 2009 at 11:52 am

We are a back water technologically – and lots of the fanboys and technical South Africans might like to decry that its simply because of the high cost of limited internet access in South Africa.

This morning I got into work at 6am to find that SAIX, the main backbone of internet in the entire country, was having a DNS problem – what a cruel April Fool’s joke – leading to all access requiring a DNS lookup outside of the country as a complete an utter stuff up.

As I tried to find another set of DNS IPs to use, I was crippled to only be able to access the South African web – and it was at that point I realised what a desert our part of the web really is – funnel.co.za? Give me a break.

South Africa doesn’t have any online email providers, doesn’t have its own practical search engine, or wiki, or media platform (even the BBC has iPlayer) – No, South Africa is a waste land.

And in seeing this, I realised there is a phenomenal opportunity. Yes, it may well be that there are very few internet users in our country compared to our total population – but there are many millions of us anyway – and we should be demanding more from our local internet.

A lot of that is up to software developers, such as myself, to build the services, products and platforms that South Africans can use – there are huge benefits to local access to rich services, and as today’s outage shows, it shouldn’t always be left to huge vendors outside of the country.

Sphere: Related Content

AcademicEarth fulfills the Internet’s promise

Posted: March 25, 2009 at 8:35 am

image

What can I say… http://academicearth.org/

The site aggregates some of the amazing web video resources of lectures from the best universities and institutes in the world.

Who can imagine the technology and human endeavours that will be sparked by sharing such a wealth of experience and knowledge freely with anyone with the internet. A truly fantastic resource!

Sphere: Related Content

Inflation in the US : Your time has come!

Posted: March 9, 2009 at 8:32 am

Everyone is running around like a headless chicken in the US at the moment about the Recession/Depression that the country is facing.

The government is printing money at a truly impressive rate, making Robert Mugabe look like a fiscal conservative. With all the TRILLIONS of dollars being pumped out by Treasury and the Fed, the people who should be worried are:

  1. The Chinese
  2. Anyone else who holds American government bonds

Just like everyone was loving being rich because there house valuations were going up - now the crowds (where is the wisdom!?) are so worried about negative growth (??? isn’t that just shrinkage?) that they are standing outside the Fed with pitchforks begging for stimulus - which is a nice way of saying printing money - which is a nice way of saying inflating the money supply - which is nice way of saying stoking inflation - which is a nice way of saying: devaluing your debt obligations by devaluing the currency.

Why can America do this? Because they won the second world war? Because they print the de-facto base currency of the world? Because their economy is still the largest in the world? Yes, all of this. Also, say what you will about China, its domestic consumption and its command economy, nothing beats the United States when it comes to avoiding the issue economically until its too late. Following the reporting on most U.S. news and finance channels, NO ONE is discussing inflation. Fascinating.

In South Africa, we have a national fascination with inflation. CPI is deeply understood by swathes of the populace, even the illiterate. South Africans understand that they need wage increases to match price increases and the inflation stability we’ve all seen over the past 15 years (last year being a fairly unwelcome change) has allowed our country to understand that inflation is a part of our economic make up.

But inflation in America is a very 70s concept, and would have remained in Paul Volcker (who is now helping Obama) hadn’t had the balls as Fed Chairman to raise interest rates in the U.S. to 15% for years (sound a bit like us doesn’t it?)

Instead, America still likes to lower capital lending rates - forget it - it bring about double harm. Firstly, money remains too cheap - and who cares if money is cheap if no one is lending. Secondly it allows inflation to run amok - the way to reign in the inflation bubble being surreptitiously created by the Fed and Treasury is to increase rates - but right now with the economy in free fall that looks to be a bitter pill to be swallowed in future.

Above all, this is not Depression 2.0 - why do I say that? Because the tools (weapons) being deployed by the U.S. government, like its army did in Vietnam, are the weapons to win the last war. Deficit spending will help the United States out of the quagmire - protecting against protectionism and the raising of tariffs is also a good start - but the fix to this depression will not be found in the theories of how the last one could have been forestalled or avoided - rather the nature of this depression can be defined by a few steps:

  1. Over lending (Asian saving culture)
  2. leading to Over borrowing (Western consumerism)
  3. leading to Leverage (Debt) spread
  4. leading to Obligation insurance (insuring the debt)
  5. leading to asset price inflation.

Essentially the value of things (I.e. Assets) has been overstated. Now one of two things can happen (although in reality, both have and will continue to happen).

  1. Assets must be revalued at truer values (lower)
  2. Money supply must be revalued at truer values (lower - I,e. inflation)

Essentially a new equilibrium must be reached between cash value, and asset value. Stimulus accelerates inflation, leading to the correct devaluation of specie. Economy in recession leads to asset revaluation leading to greater margins of safety in investment and better opportunity cost, leading to an environment that is beneficial for investment.

HOWEVER, all those who had grown used to the inflated valuation of both assets and cash are going to ’suffer’ in the sense that there capital would appear to be diminished - however the truth is that capital is effectively being revalued. Yes, those who disposed of assets at the peak have effectively been able to avoid the first round, namely the revaluation of assets, but if they retain there capital in cash, they will not escape the second wave - namely the revaluation of specie : to avoid this, capital will have to return to equity markets and allow for growth to resume in the economy.

The sooner that happens, the better - which means the time for inflation of the dollar may well have come!

Sphere: Related Content

The Unafrican Trait

Posted: January 22, 2009 at 3:48 pm

It seems we, the people of South Africa, lack an emotion. We lack it to such a degree that the absence of it in our hearts is distilled and purified in the halls of our nations power, the Union Buildings, the Parliament, the party National Committee and the halls of academia. We lack shame. We seem to have inherited the most seemingly benign of Apartheid’s crimes, which in fact is deeply malignant - namely the absence of shame when doing little or nothing to correct the wrongs that surround us.

In the stern words of Barack Obama’s inauguration speech I was reminded that America, and often only America, seems to hold itself up to a higher standard, and is willing to translate its founding principles into action. America has, does and will always fail to a certain degree in its quest to export its ideas and beliefs on a sometimes willing and sometimes unwilling global public. But America feels shame when it doesn’t act, and Americans, such as Susan Rice the new US Ambassador to the United Nations, look at America’s failures, such as inaction in Rwanda and swear: Never Again!

However South Africa is not America. Indeed we are not only lesser because we haven’t been blessed with such resources and diversity; one could argue we have been offered much by providence. Rather South Africa is lesser in the college of nations because we have no shame. We have no shame for our internal failings, and clearly we have no shame for our international ones. We stand beside a dying child, the nation of Zimbabwe and we are impotent and complicit in its self-destruction - handing the switch blade to a man sworn to cut his own heart out lest he feel love.

We are a shameful nation. A nation the world didn’t forget when we struggled under our self-made shame and cruel injustice. Now we forget everything we asked the world to remember when thinking of us. We were a plaintiff in the world’s court who once justice was found, have walked away never to give any heed to others who might plead there case for justice, and to whom we could give assistance.

South Africa’s leaders, and therefore its people’s, failure to act in Zimbabwe is a manifestation of the inability to empathise, and thus feel shame for doing nothing that is endemic in all tiers of our society. It would appear South Africans only believe in human rights and justice for themselves, and in fact it goes further than desiring it for the whole nation, South Africans are selfish enough, best exemplified in the Dear Leader, Jacob Zuma, to want a different set of rights and liberties per person.

Would it be too much to say South Africa may be the first libertarian state? How often I have dwelt on the fact, that as a white South African there is very little government for me, and what is worse there is even less for the poor, and mostly black masses of the population. The influence of government in our nation has shrunk, as it has collapsed in a morass of self-promotion and internal theft of the common purse.

Some cynics may see this as the inevitable decline of our civilization, a common descent to African failure, but I believe they are wrong. South Africa needs to rebuild its sense of shame when it does wrong, when it sides with despots and cruel regimes in the corridors of international diplomacy, and realise its moral bankruptcy in protecting a cruel despotic neighbour, to whom we should be strangling through the cessation of energy and food to him and his regime.

South Africa, and South Africans, should bring Robert Mugabe to heel. Our inability and refusal to act speaks to our light possession of the freedoms, rights and justice we claim to entrench in our common statement of purpose: the Constitution. We are not a pacifist nation, we retain an army for self-defence. We are the mightiest economy in Africa, with resources of labour and treasure incomparable on the continent. It is in our strategic interest to bring peace and prosperity to our neighbours so that we may trade with them and share in a common era of African prosperity.

No nation on earth would doubt South Africa’s commitment to soft power, especially in a time when some may have seen hard power to be the path of resolution. But now, even as the United States seeks diplomatic resolution to its security concerns, South Africans should think of the proverb favoured by Teddy Roosevelt; speak softly and carry a big stick.

The truth is, the mere threat of military action in Zimbabwe would bring Mugabe and his general’s to their knees - where they belong, begging for the mercy and amnesty which tragically should be granted under a balanced foreign policy from Pretoria. Let them go, and live in Europe with their ill gotten riches, to live their lives until time takes its justice on them, and let the people of Southern Africa join together in the task of rebuilding our neighbours home, which has been washed away with the flood we could have protected them from.

Until we feel shame, we cannot act. We must see the cruelty and inhuman nature of our inaction, and we as a country must recognise our responsibilities to our neighbours.

Until shame is rediscovered, we are a shamefully people, our eyes covered with scales, unable to see our own corruption.

Sphere: Related Content

Barack = Kanye = Obama

Posted: January 9, 2009 at 1:52 pm

Both men hail from Chicago. One is a world famous celebrity, wielding dominion over hoardes of fans. The other is Kanye West.

Check Barack during his student day’s doing a pretty good Kanye impression. The real question is, how prescient is Kanye West - to channel Barack Obama’s youthful ghost before the pics were released: the man is a media god.

original

Sphere: Related Content

Gaza + Israel = Murky Just Conflict

Posted: January 7, 2009 at 10:55 am

Last night I was telling a friend why I thought, on balance, Israel was justified in its actions in the Gaza strip, and that comparatively the death of 555 in 11 days of full on modern warfare, including several days of house to house street battles is a testament to the low casualties that the total knowledge of the battlefield, that a modern information systems based military has, can acquire. (Horrible sentence!)

Yet people are still shocked by the humanitarian strife in Gaza, and protests fill the streets of the world. This is wrong. It is a disproportional protest response for an action, which if done in a less volatile part of the world wouldn’t raise an eyebrow. 

For me, the fact that citizens of free countries, such as the UK and Canada, choose to protest in large numbers in the capitals of their states, as emissaries of the Palestinian people, many of them Muslims, says more about the inextricable political aspect of Islam as a religion, and the assumption that political pressure can be placed on foreign governments because of the actions of Israel through Muslim citizenry in those Western nations, than it does about the so-called horrendous acts of Israel.

Let’s have some perspective for a moment. Hijacking 4 planes, killing nearly 3000 innocent people, that is an act of terrorism - no one would call it genocide. To then go as far as to say that the Israeli government executing a legitimate act of self-defence and eradication of a paramilitary organisation on their borders, attacking their communities, with the loss of only 555 casualties in 11 days, suggests an restrained, if disproportionate response, on the part of the IDF and civilian authorities.

I think the expedience and efficiency of the operation, and its understandable tactical objective, the cessation of rocket fire into Southern Israel, is completely justified. The Israelis have the right to adjust the security equation in Southern Israel. Hamas is an organisation which wants to destroy the state of Israel, saying it has no right to exist. This should be an affront to all member states of the United Nations - the election of Hamas may have been legitimate - I can’t comment on that - but democracy is not a pick and mix - you either subscribe to democratic, liberal and capitalistic ideas or you don’t. Hamas winning an election and calling it democracy is no different to calling the pig circuses of the Politburo elections in the USSR democracy in action: It simply is not.

Of course the victims of violence, in both Gaza and Southern Israel are the ones who suffer due to both sides inability to come to agreements on peace and security. I believe the Israel, despite its militaristic stance, and paranoia towards Palestinian intentions, will one day welcome the formation of a Palestinian state. BUT I think any thinking individual would see that as it stands at the moment, an organisation like Hamas, with a founding tenet being the overthrow of Israel as a state cannot be a partner for peace.

I do however think, and the PLO is proof of this, that Hamas could change, that many of its members have been radicalised by depression, poverty and frustration with the Palestinian Authority and the siege of Gaza. In this Israel must take blame too… Israel must extend the hand of peace, but at times will have to use the stick to eliminate the hard line elements in Hamas who will NEVER come around to a two state solution. When that stick is wielded though, the world should leave it to the diplomats, and not protest in the street and pick a side.  

 

 

Sphere: Related Content

A Funeral in Langa

Posted: January 2, 2009 at 1:15 pm

I haven’t blogged in a long time. I’ve been pretty busy with life and living, proving the living vs. blogging ratio is inversely proportional.

I’ve just returned from a funeral. The funeral of a great friend, a friend of mine for the last 10 years, a friend lost to a car accident, Ashley Buti aka Ashley Ngcelwane.

I haven’t been able to really articulate to anyone the feelings I have about Ashley’s death. I have known him under many conditions, at school, at varsity, as a house mate, and socialised with him in many settings, revealing the social chameleon that he was, as well as the resolute character and person who shared with everyone.

When you go to a funeral, and many people say that the young man who died was destined to one day become president of the country, you must know that you are witnessing the setting down of a great soul, and a man who inspired other men.

It seems again I am called to voice my feelings, and my memories, and once again in this year of 2008, I cannot find an answer in my own voice, my voice of prose, but rather in the voice of verse. For like Homer, I am blind in the world of my own silence, I can only find my vision and voice in the rhythm of verse.

Death of a Future President

Come now, and hear the church bell’s ring.
The people come, the people sing
Tears are shed, flags fly low.
The king is dead. The king no one else will ever know.

Come now, and listen to the people speak.
Words pouring out on the floor like flooded milk
All to turn sour in the church’s heat.
For words cannot serve as balm, to a mother’s ache.

He was my friend. He was my brother. He was a true son.
The wails and songs, trying to bring comfort to everyone.

Future president in our hearts, we know vote for him.
Truth is he would tell us to sing a different hymn.

The world is ours to change in service and deed.
His message to us, one of friendship indeed.
Our lost friend, our voice of wisdom and reason.
We will be reunited, but only after many seasons.

The heat of the sun fills my head.
I cannot believe the future president is dead.

Now in silence his voice whispers in my ear
“Do not worry”… “I am here, I am hear”.

Silence broken at night by falling glass
Dreams lying shattered on Christmas morning’s dewy grass.
Returned to Christ, the saviour and king.
But lost to us now, lost to our future.

Smile now, smile as he does now in heaven.
Smile for the future we will work and sweat to bring.
Learn from the lessons of a life fully lived.
Do not be afraid, to live to the full.

Politics, people, religion and life
Those are not all that defined his life.
But rather love of family and friends.
Now gone for a little while, just a little while.

I will never know how to expresses my feelings of sadness and apology to his family and other friends. What I can say is that I am confident my friend is pleased with his life, maybe a little frustrated that he wasn’t able to achieve all he thought he would, but time will show us all that the seed planted in everyone he knew, simply by knowing him, will grow into a fine tree of legacy that will exceed his earthly expectations.

Go well Ashley, we all loved you.

Sphere: Related Content

Common Craft : The Irony

Posted: December 1, 2008 at 6:08 pm

commoncraft

 

Common Craft is a pretty cool company. They make complex things understandable to the common man. So I could help but laugh when I hit there web page today, and splashed across the front in bright red was a Drupal error that only a SQL-Talker (there is a good reason for SQL  being a mandatory second language) would understand.

Hate to give them bad PR, but

user warning: Got error 28 from storage engine query: SELECT t.* FROM term_node r INNER JOIN term_data t ON r.tid = t.tid INNER JOIN vocabulary v ON t.vid = v.vid WHERE r.nid = 1667 ORDER BY v.weight, t.weight, t.name in /var/www/DRUPAL-5/html/includes/database.mysql.inc on line 172.

is not common craft for anyone!

Sphere: Related Content

The future

Posted: November 18, 2008 at 1:05 pm

This Modern World By Tom Tomorrow

Sphere: Related Content

Mock yourself : JCVD is real cinema

Posted: November 13, 2008 at 3:51 pm

Jean-Claude Van Damme is a guilty pleasure of those of us who grew up thinking that Terminator 2 was more violence than one could possibly handle.

Jean Claude Van Damme in JCVD.

Read more at Time Magazine

But the man has gone from weakness to weakness. Until now, with a new project called JCVD, which in a turn as surreal as Brett Easton Ellis’ Lunar Park, explores a parallel universe in which the washed up Van Damme is embroiled in a botched bank heist.

As our world descends into a spiral of vapid celebrity, and as the ages provide us with an ever larger onion of human artistic record, stories such as JCVD will present us with more and more to enjoy. In the same was Pauly Shore is Dead allowed us one last voyeuristic journey into that failed celebrity, at least so we thought, JCVD speaks to a dark human truth - that no matter our successes, we are all destined to be something of a failure in the fullness of time.

Van Damme exposes his failure for us all to see. Like Mickey Rourke did in Wrestler, Van Damme is ready to show himself once more to the world, warts and all. The irony being, this story is perhaps greater than all the rest - it would seem the world isn’t in need of a hero. What the world needs is an Everyman as imperfect as the world we all share.

Sphere: Related Content

Return

Posted: November 12, 2008 at 6:03 pm

I’ve been very busy for the last couple of weeks, getting older (26??? why!!!), getting through a raft of work, and personal crap. Enough of the excuses, I try to avoid self-reference in blog posts; but I wanted to just say keep your browsers pointed towards the blog, I’m going to try get back up to a post a day.

There have been a lot of things well worth of comment:

  • The election of Barack Obama to the U.S. Presidency
  • The breakup of the ANC
  • The Watson saga??? (why has this been on the front of my blog for so long, I don’t care about rugby that much).

I’ve been writing on the blog for nearly a year now, and I’m going to refocus on some more abstract issues, particularly around organisational and quantitive theory, with a look at meta cognition.

As always, I’ll still get on my soapbox from time to time, to look at the headlines of the day, and to pass couch commentary on the commentators that fill the pages of South Africa’s newspapers and sites.

Sphere: Related Content

Fair point by Mpondozenyathi on Watson saga

Posted: October 15, 2008 at 11:08 am

Reading a letter to The Times today, reader Jeff Mpondozenyathi makes a balanced expression that Cheeky Watson and his son Luke are right in their vehement criticism of the Springbok emblem, and the complicity that many in the rugby had with Apartheid.

I don’t agree with Mpondozenyathi, but I understand his frustration and his feelings about the Springbok emblem. I wouldn’t say that evil of Apartheid was done to the majority of South Africans “in the name of the Springbok colours”. I think here he overreaches in his otherwise coherent argument.

I have also reflected on my article earlier in the week, and think I went too far in saying that the Watsons shouldn’t have a place in a dialogue of reconciliation - inspired by The Arch’s reminder to us all that even Osama bin Laden is one of God’s children - we must remember, in an infinitely smaller way that those like the Watson’s who we would disagree with on the issues of today, must be acknowledged for their moral courage in the past.

However previous moral courage doesn’t provide one with a bully pulpit for eternity. Cheeky Watson’s stand against the rugby authorities in the Eastern Cape, was an act of moral courage. But to suggest that his silver spooned son has anything to do with this sacrifice is like me claiming that the actions of my father should completely exonerate and bolster me in my life - moral stands are passed on, they are not automatically inherited, and a man like Luke, a similar age as myself, simply cannot understand the true nature of Apartheid, as was experienced by all adults, black and white, during its existence.

His insistence that rugby is controlled by ‘dutchmen’ and that he wants to vomit on the springbok emblem is unprofessional. No one doubts that rugby must be transformed, and that the rugby community has racists in it - but his assumption is the typical assumption of many white english South Africans - that racism is an Afrikaans disease and that they, the English, are immune.

That simply isn’t true. As the great satirist Uys once said: “Wear the DP T-Shirt, and Vote National Party” - English South Africans, then and now, continue to harbour racism as much as Afrikaners. And unlike many Afrikaners, there racism is far more insidious, because as they laud the achievements of the black diamond’s children at St Cyprians or Bishops, where their own children go, they would never deign to spend time with ‘real’ black South Africans, the teeming masses who fill the squatter camps and town ships, not the small black elite who think, dress and act like white English people anyway.

Instead they can pretend to ignore their own racism, whilst mocking the Afrikaner, the only truly African white ‘tribe’ if you will, for having simmering tension between other African tribes. I have no doubt that many Afrikaners, just as the English do, hold racist views. But then increasingly it is understood that many South Africans do hold racist views either which way - and the challenge is not to suppress this racism but rather explore why it remains in our society and finally to integrate and reconcile it out of our body politic - which may take several generations - since people of my age, whether it be Bok Van Blerk or Luke Watson - seem to be so uninspired that they would rather fight the fights of the past, rather than build a common multi-cultural future.

In conclusion, Mpondozenyathi makes the most important point of all - that Watson has as much a right to speak about how he feels about rugby’s past as the next person - I agree - Watson does have that right. But he also has the right to NOT play for an organisation which he feels fuels racist attitudes and perpetuates Apartheid based thinking in modern South Africa. He doesn’t choose to exercise that right - instead he happily draws players fees from the Western Province and National rugby structures. And that is hypocrisy. In anyone’s language.

Sphere: Related Content

Watson and his dad have no place in the dialogue of reconciliation in South Africa.

Posted: October 13, 2008 at 11:00 am

Luke Watson, and his father, are controversial figures in South African rugby, a sport which is plagued with racist and intra white (i.e. English Vs. Afrikaans) destructive attitudes. But it is also a great bridge builder, as the Great reconciler, Nelson Mandela showed brilliantly in 1995.

South Africans, of all races, are proud of South Africa. Should we tolerate someone who aspires to be paid to represent us, who feels the sort of revulsion at the symbol of the day of our national rugby team? We shouldn’t. In the same way we wouldn’t tolerate a player who didn’t agree with the ruling elites in soccer say he wanted to ‘vomit on the jersey’ because of the cabal that control SAFA.

Watson, and his father Cheeky, are the worst sort of white South African - the one’s who can’t get over the fact that race in South Africa is a challenge to be overcome, not a burden to be carried by all forever. Jewish communities have an established archetype to describe individuals such as the Watsons: The self-hating Jew.

If Cheeky, and his son Luke, hate rugby, its structures, its emblems, its old sad and new exciting history so much - then maybe they shouldn’t be involved. Even the ANC, despite its Polokwane propositions - feels that the Springbok should remain until all stakeholders have been listened to, and a consensus reached.

I think the Springbok should remain in the SA rugby mix, but should possibly be balanced with a national sporting identity, possibly around the Protea or perhaps some other African animal without such a legacy as the Springbok.

We as a nation need to not forget that the work of reconciliation between cultural groups and races is not complete. But reconciliation requires mutual respect, and an understanding of our common humanity, and occasional desire for differing approaches and norms in our differing cultures, so as to create a cohesive and plural society based on respect and appreciation for ‘the other’ - whilst not tearing down our friends who aren’t necessarily the same as us in totality.

This sort of reconciliation, and understanding, doesn’t seem to be part of Luke and Cheeky’s make up. Instead they seem to think that there are credits earned by Cheeky during Apartheid that now deserve to be cashed in by Luke on his behalf. This is nauseating (excuse the pun) and tragic opportunism - no doubt, had Apartheid not ended Luke would still have gunned for the Green and Gold, and simply would have had to have some other rhetoric to launch himself there.

It is not unreasonable for us, as citizens, to expect our national representatives to be proud of country and its symbols. Many men, who have FAR MORE A RIGHT TO BE AGGREIVED BY THE SPRINGBOK than Luke Watson, all the men of colour who have represented our nation since the reintegration of South African rugby, have worn it with pride and shown all South Africans that rugby can be a bridge to reconciliation. But instead, Luke Watson has taken it upon himself to deride the Afrikaner, and the symbology that a man as great as Nelson Mandela was not ashamed to don in the interests of national identity and a common humanity in our Country.

Luckily Luke and his daddy who got him all his spots in rugby over years are just playing a game with a pigskin, and not something that really matters - like ruling our nation.

Sphere: Related Content